Quantcast
Channel: RSPCA – Metro
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 2018

Puppies left with tails hanging off after former butcher illegally docked them

$
0
0

A couple have been banned from keeping dogs for five years after ‘mutilating’ seven puppies by illegally docking their tails.

Former butcher Wayne Glasby, 37, and Joanne Glasby, 50, claimed they ‘had not even noticed’ the tails were missing when the RSPCA visited them on November 30.

Joanne Glasby even tried to claim she had never even seen the puppies before – even though the pictures had been taken in her house.

At an earlier hearing they pleaded guilty to two offences under the Animal Welfare Act 2006*. RSPCA Inspector Leanne Booth said: "This case involved seven puppies whose tails had been illegally docked with lamb docking rings. "We were contacted by someone who had seen three of the puppies in an online advert. They knew what the law says on tail docking and asked lots of questions, and much of the evidence they collected enabled us to bring this case so we are extremely grateful to them. "When we attended the Glasby's address we were shown four puppies. Two of them had partially docked tails, the bone was still there but had not quite fallen off. The other two puppies' tails were still open wounds with the bones exposed. "When I showed the picture of the three from the advert to Joanne Glasby she said she'd never seen those pups before even though she admitted the picture had clearly been taken in her house. "The defendants lied the whole way through this process, blaming each other, at one point saying a vet did the docking, then saying they didn't even know the dogs had no tails.??? As well as the five year disqualification on keeping dogs, they were also sentenced to a 12 month community order including 150 hours of unpaid work each, and ordered to pay ??600 costs and an ??85 victim surcharge each. Tail docking is illegal under the Animal Welfare Act 2006 unless for medical purposes. It is a painful process, can impact on how dogs communicate and is often wholly unnecessary. The RSPCA does not believe any animals should be mutilated for cosmetic purposes and that removing part or all of the tail should only be done for medical reasons. Proven working dogs of certain types (terrier and terrier to terrier crosses, spaniels and spaniel to spaniel crosses, hunt point retrievers and crosses of those types) can be exempted from this ban but only a vet can carry out the procedure, and must complete a certificate to say that they are satisfied with the evid
A couple have been banned from keeping dogs for five years after illegally docking puppies’ tails (Picture: RSPCA)
At an earlier hearing they pleaded guilty to two offences under the Animal Welfare Act 2006*. RSPCA Inspector Leanne Booth said: "This case involved seven puppies whose tails had been illegally docked with lamb docking rings. "We were contacted by someone who had seen three of the puppies in an online advert. They knew what the law says on tail docking and asked lots of questions, and much of the evidence they collected enabled us to bring this case so we are extremely grateful to them. "When we attended the Glasby's address we were shown four puppies. Two of them had partially docked tails, the bone was still there but had not quite fallen off. The other two puppies' tails were still open wounds with the bones exposed. "When I showed the picture of the three from the advert to Joanne Glasby she said she'd never seen those pups before even though she admitted the picture had clearly been taken in her house. "The defendants lied the whole way through this process, blaming each other, at one point saying a vet did the docking, then saying they didn't even know the dogs had no tails.??? As well as the five year disqualification on keeping dogs, they were also sentenced to a 12 month community order including 150 hours of unpaid work each, and ordered to pay ??600 costs and an ??85 victim surcharge each. Tail docking is illegal under the Animal Welfare Act 2006 unless for medical purposes. It is a painful process, can impact on how dogs communicate and is often wholly unnecessary. The RSPCA does not believe any animals should be mutilated for cosmetic purposes and that removing part or all of the tail should only be done for medical reasons. Proven working dogs of certain types (terrier and terrier to terrier crosses, spaniels and spaniel to spaniel crosses, hunt point retrievers and crosses of those types) can be exempted from this ban but only a vet can carry out the procedure, and must complete a certificate to say that they are satisfied with the evid
Two of the puppies’ tails were left hanging off with the bone exposed due to the illegal procedure (Picture: RSPCA)

Officers were alerted to the abuse when the pair advertised the puppies for sale online.

During the inspection four puppies, aged around six to seven weeks, with docked tails were found and a further three were identified from photographs.

thumbnail for post ID 9086948Puppy stuck under rock pile thanks rescuer with a flurry of kisses

Prosecutor Andy Cash told Sheffield Magistrates’ Court that two of the puppies’ tails were left hanging off with the bone exposed due to the illegal procedure.

Under the law, only proven working dogs can have their tails docked by a trained vet before they are five days old.

But RSPCA Inspector Leanne Booth said: ‘By their own admission these poor puppies had their tails docked by the Glasbys at five weeks old, way beyond what is allowed by law when conducted by a vet.’

At an earlier hearing they pleaded guilty to two offences under the Animal Welfare Act 2006*. RSPCA Inspector Leanne Booth said: "This case involved seven puppies whose tails had been illegally docked with lamb docking rings. "We were contacted by someone who had seen three of the puppies in an online advert. They knew what the law says on tail docking and asked lots of questions, and much of the evidence they collected enabled us to bring this case so we are extremely grateful to them. "When we attended the Glasby's address we were shown four puppies. Two of them had partially docked tails, the bone was still there but had not quite fallen off. The other two puppies' tails were still open wounds with the bones exposed. "When I showed the picture of the three from the advert to Joanne Glasby she said she'd never seen those pups before even though she admitted the picture had clearly been taken in her house. "The defendants lied the whole way through this process, blaming each other, at one point saying a vet did the docking, then saying they didn't even know the dogs had no tails.??? As well as the five year disqualification on keeping dogs, they were also sentenced to a 12 month community order including 150 hours of unpaid work each, and ordered to pay ??600 costs and an ??85 victim surcharge each. Tail docking is illegal under the Animal Welfare Act 2006 unless for medical purposes. It is a painful process, can impact on how dogs communicate and is often wholly unnecessary. The RSPCA does not believe any animals should be mutilated for cosmetic purposes and that removing part or all of the tail should only be done for medical reasons. Proven working dogs of certain types (terrier and terrier to terrier crosses, spaniels and spaniel to spaniel crosses, hunt point retrievers and crosses of those types) can be exempted from this ban but only a vet can carry out the procedure, and must complete a certificate to say that they are satisfied with the evid
The dogs have all since been rehomed (Picture: RSPCA)

Docking involves cutting the blood supply off from the tail until it falls off.

The Glasby’s were found to have tried to carry out the procedure at their home in Thurcroft, near Rotherham, South Yorkshire, using lamb docking rings.

thumbnail for post ID 9085787Harry Potter books burned by priests for being 'against word of God'

Mr Cash said it would have left the puppies in ‘unnecessary pain which is anticipated to have lasted a few days.’

When Wayne Glasby was interviewed by police he admitted owning the puppies but denied docking their tails, instead claiming a vet had done it.

But when attempts were made to contact the vet it was found out they did not exist.

At an earlier hearing they pleaded guilty to two offences under the Animal Welfare Act 2006*. RSPCA Inspector Leanne Booth said: "This case involved seven puppies whose tails had been illegally docked with lamb docking rings. "We were contacted by someone who had seen three of the puppies in an online advert. They knew what the law says on tail docking and asked lots of questions, and much of the evidence they collected enabled us to bring this case so we are extremely grateful to them. "When we attended the Glasby's address we were shown four puppies. Two of them had partially docked tails, the bone was still there but had not quite fallen off. The other two puppies' tails were still open wounds with the bones exposed. "When I showed the picture of the three from the advert to Joanne Glasby she said she'd never seen those pups before even though she admitted the picture had clearly been taken in her house. "The defendants lied the whole way through this process, blaming each other, at one point saying a vet did the docking, then saying they didn't even know the dogs had no tails.??? As well as the five year disqualification on keeping dogs, they were also sentenced to a 12 month community order including 150 hours of unpaid work each, and ordered to pay ??600 costs and an ??85 victim surcharge each. Tail docking is illegal under the Animal Welfare Act 2006 unless for medical purposes. It is a painful process, can impact on how dogs communicate and is often wholly unnecessary. The RSPCA does not believe any animals should be mutilated for cosmetic purposes and that removing part or all of the tail should only be done for medical reasons. Proven working dogs of certain types (terrier and terrier to terrier crosses, spaniels and spaniel to spaniel crosses, hunt point retrievers and crosses of those types) can be exempted from this ban but only a vet can carry out the procedure, and must complete a certificate to say that they are satisfied with the evid
The pair tried to claim they had not even noticed’ the tails were missing (Picture: RSPCA)

Joanne Glasby told officers she was also responsible for the puppies and denied knowing who was responsible for docking their tails.

Helen White, mitigating, said her clients had rehomed all the dogs ahead of the hearing apart from a 12-year-old lurcher that they hoped a relative would take care of.

thumbnail for post ID 9086912Anger at 'hard-hitting' film on Islamophobia is 'ironic', says Muslim filmmaker

She said Joanne Glasby had no previous offences and the proceedings had a ‘traumatic’ impact on the couple, who kept a smallholding with a pony, sheep and lambs.

Deputy district judge Derek French said they were ‘serious offences’, and added: ‘There’s no doubt that these dogs would have been under extreme discomfort and that is not acceptable.

‘It concerns me that you run a smallholding which you use to look after sheep and lambs but I don’t have any evidence in front of me about their welfare.’

As well as the ban, the couple were also sentenced to a 12 month community order including 150 hours of unpaid work each.

Each was ordered to pay £600 costs and an £85 surcharge.

Got a story for Metro.co.uk?

If you have a story for our news team, email us at webnews@metro.co.uk.

You can also follow us on Facebook and Twitter.


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 2018

Trending Articles